Hopefully the fact that a nicer, more engaging casino attracting more people would be motivation enough, but with a slots barn, I don't know.Īgreed. I don't have much of the details, so it is hard to say, but humor me for now. I'm all for the casinos, but this just seems to be inviting disaster. Forgive me for my cynicism once again, but once a temporary facility is in place, what incentive is there to provide any promised civic amenity, apart from allowing expansion of more slots? Does the city have any power at all to require them to build phase 2 in the manner in which the designs state, on any sort of timeline at all? Or can they just claim economic factors and maintain whatever they want, whenever they want, citing temporary status?
